karen finney, great to have you with us tonight. i appreciate your time. thanks for staying with us here on the ed show. i'm ed schultz. the rachel maddow show starts right now. good evening, rachel. >> good evening, ed. have a great weekend my friend. thank you. >> you too. thank you. >> thanks to you at home for staying with us for the next hour. iran is getting its own internet. its own private internet. see the real internet is very dissatisfying to the government of iran. there is all sorts of stuff on the internet the iranian mullahs do not like so they've been busy closing off bits of internet to the iranian public. you can't use google. now you can't use youtube. you can't use specific sites where the government doesn't like what you can read there or what you can see there. they've been doing that forever. kind of playing with the internet. iran's government is apparently getting tired of managing the increasingly complex patchwork of things they want to block the people in their country from seeing online and so instead they have a genius idea.

they are suggesting they may just close off access to the real internet all together and instead build themselves their own internal government approved internet. just for their own country. it's not really an internet. it is more like an iran-ternet. they will build their own separate but equal. ridiculous right? but you can understand that sort of controlling dictatorial impulse here that gives rise to that sort of ridiculousness. in america we don't have controlling mullahs. we don't have dictators but when we have that same kind of impulse, when we are horrified by the real information in the world and we want to wall ourselves off from it and create a more comforting, fake truth for ourselves, in america when we have that impulse, it looks like this. >> conservatives obviously not happy with these main stream polls that are out there. a lot of talk about the polls being weighted incorrectly. >> well, if you're curious for

another taking to unskewed polls.com which is an attempt to reweight the polls. >> an attempt to reweight the polls. when the polls were particularly dire for the republican presidential candidate mitt romney in the election, presidential election polling this past month conservatives decided these polls showing an american electorate that is choosing president obama over mitt romney, these polls made them feel so uncomfortable they decided to develop a new fantasy electorate that they would poll in theory and their fantasy electorate which is not the real electorate would give them a much more comforting list of results in terms of their fake polls. it was the same dynamic at work when they invented conservative-a-pedia. something you read about the world on wikipedia, if it makes you uncomfortable as a conservative, conservative-a-pedia is guaranteed to only contain

information that makes you feel okay. if you are discomfited by the idea the human species is a result of millenia of evolution for example conserve-a-pedia has you covered. not only has it been debunked by the obvious fact that humans and dinosaurs co-existed, but in fact according to conserve-a-pedia dinosaurs are actually still here and have been seen in new guinea twice since 1990. see if you don't like the real world, invent your own. you know it is not only the right that does this. this week we got a great lefty conspiracy theory about the first presidential debate. it was sort of an update on the democratic conspiracy theory from the first debate in 2004. it was the theory that president george w. bush, remember this, had a listening device implanted in his suit while he was debating john kerry. the problem with that george w. bush conspiracy theory of course

was always that john kerry absolutely destroyed george w. bush in that debate when bush was supposedly wearing a listening device. so if he was wearing a listening device whoever was supposedly whispering in the president's ear was not whispering things that helped him. that's always the part i didn't understand. but the 2012 version of that theory now is that mitt romney cheated in the debate against president obama this week not by having somebody feed him the answers through an ear piece but rather by bringing the illegal crib sheet on to the debate stage with him. you see, previous debate rules have set out very clearly that, quote, no props, notes, charts, diagrams, or other writings or other tangible things may be brought into the debate by any candidate and yet have a look at this damning evidence. this is at the very beginning of the debate on wednesday night and as you'll be able to see clearly here what is that in your pocket? mr. romney very clearly pulls something from his right pocket and he pops it on to the podium in front of him.

violation. violation. according to the conspiracy, complete with the grainy, slow mo youtube videos, this is mr. romney cheating. now he must have been working from note cards the entire debate. the explanation from the romney campaign is mr. romney was not pulling notes out of his pocket. he was pulling out of his pocket a handkerchief. sure enough, a little later on, oop, in the debate mr. romney is seen wiping his nose with said handkerchief. so whether you are persuaded by mitt romney wiping his nose on what is supposed to be his crib sheet notes, if you're on the left, again, like this is a conspiracy theory that just does not help. president obama did not win the first debate against mitt romney. whether or not you're happy about that he didn't win. but if your takeaway from this conspiracy theory in this debate is the reason the president didn't win is because mitt romney cheated, then what is the utility of that theory for you?

what is the utility of that information? how do you think president obama should then prepare for the second debate? should he just do exactly what he did this past wednesday night, except keep a closer eye out for the cheating because that is the only reason he lost? i mean, it may be comforting to tell yourself this is what really went wrong here but that is not really what went wrong here and making the case that it was does not help your candidate. the worst example of this though, the invention of a comforting new parallel reality that does not mean you have to face hard truths. the worst new instance of this is how the right today responded to the new jobs numbers. today the unemployment rate dropped from 8.1% to 7.8%. it didn't drop for any of the bad reasons that the unemployment rate sometimes drops. it dropped for the good reasons. it was actually a pretty good jobs report which of course to the right is terrible news. so they have chosen to not believe the new jobs numbers. the first place this blew up today was on twitter.

the former ceo of general electric jack welch, general electric i should say is a minority owner of this company, mr. welch tweeted, quote, unbelievable jobs numbers. these chicago guys will do anything. can't debate so change numbers. jarek jarek -- jack welch accusing the white house of manipulating this month's jobs data so it would look better for the president. always up for a good conspiracy theory republican congressman alan west of florida concurred and wrote, quote, in regards to today's jobs report i agree with former ge ceo jack welch. chicago style politics is at work here. from there it was sort of off to the races. republican congressman paul brown of georgia, quote, september jobs report raises questions. quote, i don't think bls cooked numbers. i think a bunch of dems lied about getting jobs. that would have the same effect. that was from a senior writer at

something called the washington examiner, a conservative thing online. eric bolling who is at fox news, he wrote, wow. obama labor department smarter than all 25 of america's top economists. or something far more inside ous. i don't know. then there was this from conservative talk radio host laura ingram. quote, jobs numbers from labor secretary hilda solis are total pro obama propaganda. just looking on twitter you could see the ground swell on the right that they were going to build their own iran-ternet on this. forget the real world they were going to build their own private world that made them happier. the real world is inconvenient. we will have our own. the real facts are not accepted. we will have our own. time for fresh fact. you could see the ground swell building for this on the right first online but then of course where it fully blossomed was on

cable news. >> oh, how convenient that the right dropped below 8% for the first time in 43 months five weeks before an election. that's why there is some mistrust of these numbers. >> i told you they'd get it under 8%. they did. >> a great argument. >> you can let america decide how they got it there. >> some people will be very cynical a government number will come out this great on the eve of the election. i'll make a guarantee right now. i don't like to do this but i guarantee when this is revised the unemployment rate will be back above 8%. >> you are alleging specifically that the president is engaging in a coverup of the data. you are saying that the administration is actively manipulating that data. correct? >> well, absolutely. >> let me do this. guys, pull up the full screen, something we found out today. we did our home work a little bit. the bureau of labor statistics full screen if you can show that. there are at least two. harley frazis and stephen phillips that work at the bureau of labor statistics currently

who both have been donors to the obama campaign. >> look, i don't know what the right number is but i'll tell you these numbers don't smell right when you think about where the economy is right now. >> what evidence do you have that they got to the bls? >> i don't. >> chicago guys got to the bureau of labor statistics and affected these numbers? >> i have no evidence to prove that. i just raised the question. >> you didn't raise the question. you said these chicago guys will do anything. >> yeah. >> so they changed the number. you say these chicago guys will do anything so they changed the numbers. do you want to take that back? >> no i don't want to take it back. >> this is an assertion there was corruption here and infiltration or getting to the -- it's not funny, jack. you're talking about the president of the united states playing with the bureau of labor sticks numbers. this is nixon stuff. jack, do you want to take back the charge that there was corruption here? >> no i don't want to take back one word in that tweet. you don't think it's coincidental that we've got the biggest surge since 1983 and in

the jobs surge? come on, chris. >> do you mean it's a coincidence or do you mean you have evidence that there was corruption here in these numbers? >> i have no evidence of corruption. none whatsoever. >> okay. so these chicago guys had nothing to do with number coming out today. >> i don't know that. >> i just heard from jack welch with respect i guess was about ten minutes of absolute nonsense with no grounding in what the bureau of labor statistics actually does. >> joining us now is jared bernstein who you just saw there responding to jack welch on "hardball" today. he is a senior fellow at the budget and policy priorities and msnbc and cnbc contributor. thank you for being here. i was absolutely riveted by that today and could not wait to continue the conversation. >> look. it's funny. i just walked by the bls on my way up here. it is a venerable institution. they've been putting out reports for well over 50 years and there's never been any

allegation or any substance to a claim like that at all. in fact, i was trying to remember there was something and it was back in 2008. the bureau of labor statistics mistakenly released a report 25 seconds early and, boy. heads rolled and they had to do a whole investigation of the data release procedure. i mean, this is an agency that, where statistical integrity is above all. if i took you through some of the procedures, the incryption, the discipline. when they have meetings they put paper over the windows. janitors aren't allowed to empty waste baskets until the reports are released. so if you are going to make an allegation like jack welch made you better have some really solid evidence. he had not even unsolid evidence. he had nothing. >> jared, one of the things we've seen over the course of i guess it's more than the past year, sort of the ramp up of the

presidential campaign so maybe the past 18 months or two years, is that every time there is a bad jobs number the right moves on it as if it is gospel. but every time there is a good jobs number, good unemployment number, they have been questioning it more or less. today was definitely more but more or less for more than a year now. i mean, is there any -- you just described the carefulness of the bls. is there any history of these things in modern times being jimmied for political gain? are they going on anything real? >> there is absolutely no history. no they are not going on anything that is real. these are sample data. they come from a sample of about 50,000 households every month. when you have samples you have statistical noise, margins of error. the same thing you talk about when you say poll results are within this many points margin of error. these samples and these results have those same margins. and sometimes you get a large positive outlier like in the jobs side today and sometimes a large negative outlier.

in fact one of the things i wrote in my report on these numbers early this morning before all that jack welch craziness was that i would discount this number because -- but over the past three months the jobs numbers from the household survey have been essentially flat. i knew that was wrong too. in fact they had a couple negatives in there. so you have to average over the past few months. now if you take that average, if you do that, you will find and now i'm using establishment data which is more reliable month to month, let's talk a little bit about facts here. if you actually average the jobs data you'll find that over the past three months we've been adding 146,000 jobs per month. if you go back to the previous quarter, the second quarter of the year, we were adding 67,000 jobs per month. so no question that there's been an acceleration in the pace of job growth and that is a good sign. there is some momentum in the labor market. >> it's a good sign provided that you want good things for

the country. it's a bad sign if you want the economy bad so you can blame the incumbent president and beat him at the election. >> providing you are amenable to facts and reasonable discourse and you know something about the way statistical procedures work it is a good thing to know yes. >> jared bernstein senior fellow at the center on budget and policy priorities, thank you very much for your time tonight and being willing to call bs where it needed to be called. thank you. >> thank you. >> i will say my take on this to my republican friends who are watching and i know you're watching because i can hear you complaining sometimes, here is the thing about complaining about these numbers. you're not helping even your own guy. you heard what jared just said there about how we are getting improving jobs numbers. we are getting accelerating economic groelwth, right? if you are going to lie about the numbers you can only lie for so long before people stop believing your conspiracy theory and eventually your candidate is going to need a theory and a case to the country for why he should be elected even though the economy is getting better. denying that truth and thereby

precluding him from making that argument will not help him get elected president. word to the wise that you will never take from me, i know. we'll be right back. [ music playing, children laughing ] [ slap! slap! slap! ] [ music, laughter stop ] [ male announcer ] when your favorite foods fight you, fight back fast with tums smoothies. so fast and smooth, you'll forget you had heartburn. ♪ tum tum tum tum tums [ male announcer ] tums smoothies. ♪ tum tum tum tum tums if we want to improve our schools... ...what should we invest in? maybe new buildings? what about updated equipment? they can help, but recent research shows... ...nothing transforms schools like investing in advanced teacher education. let's build a strong foundation.

let's invest in our teachers so they can inspire our students. let's solve this. overmany discounts to thine customers! [old english accent] safe driver, multi-car, paid in full -- a most fulsome bounty indeed, lord jamie. thou cometh and we thy saveth! what are you doing? we doth offer so many discounts, we have some to spare. oh, you have any of those homeowners discounts? here we go. thank you. he took my shield, my lady. these are troubling times in the kingdom. more discounts than we knoweth what to do with. now that's progressive. yeah, i'm looking to save, but i'm not sure which policy is right for me. you should try our coverage checker. it helps you see if you have too much coverage or not enough, making it easier to get what you need. [ beeping ] these are great! [ beeping ] how are you, um, how are you doing? i'm going to keep looking over here.

probably a good idea. ken: what's a good idea? nothing. with coverage checker, it's easy to find your perfect policy. visit progressive.com today. [ female announcer ] one drop of ultra dawn has twice the everyday grease cleaning ingredients of one drop of the leading non-concentrated brand... to clean 2x more greasy dishes. dawn does more. so it's not a chore.

try the #1 gastroenterologist recommended probiotic. align. align naturally helps maintain digestive balance. ♪ ooh, baby, can i do for you today? ♪ try align today. in 2008 nearly 30% of voters on the great state of ohio cast their ballots before election day. one-third of the electorate in that crucially important swing state voted early in the '08 election. of the people who voted early in ohio 2008 they favored barack obama over john mccain by nearly

60/40. so early voting was a great thing for the democratic side the last time barack obama ran for president. if you're a republican you can see the problem. when the republican party subsequently took over control of state government in ohio, they moved to shut down as much early voting as they could. ohio republicans first tried to cut early voting in half. democrats were able to block them on that so then they came up with a plan where only republican leaning counties would have weekend and week night early voting but democratic leaning counties would not have those hours. that was subtle. they didn't get away with that either. finally they tried to settle on all the counties in the state having the same early voting hours but early voting would stop throughout the state days sooner than it usually did. the last three days before the election including the all important last sunday before the election when african-american churches in particular typically organized their souls to the

polls car pool trips to bring people to early vote. ohio's republican governor and legislature and secretary of state tried to settle on a plan where, yeah. there would be some early voting and okay, fine. it'll be basically uniform throughout the state but they wanted to cut off the last three days. they wanted to cut off early voting before the crucial last three days before the election. when something like a hundred thousand ohio votes were cast the last time around. they tried to lop off those last three days. well today the sixth circuit u.s. court of appeals blocked ohio republicans from doing that. the court today reinstated early voting on the final three days before the election. ohio's republican secretary of state jon husted responded by saying that he was reviewing the court's decision and, quote, no action will be taken today or this weekend. yeah. no rush. not like there is a big election already under way or anything. it's not like anything hinges on

ohio. take your time. more ahead on this. stay with us. in celebration of over 75 years of our government employees insurance company, or geico...as most of you know it. ...i propose savings for everyone! i'm talking hundreds here... and furthermore.. newcaster: breaking news. the gecko is demanding free pudding. and political parties that are actual parties! with cake! and presents! ah, that was good. too bad nobody could hear me. geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. stay top of mind with customers? from deals that bring them in with an offer... to social media promotions that turn fans into customers... to events that engage and create buzz... to e-mails that keep loyal customers coming back, our easy-to-use tools will keep you in front of your customers. see what's right for you at constantcontact.com/try.

last night on this show we had a scoop about the election in pennsylvania. it's a bit of an unfortunate scoop. the basics of the situation in pennsylvania are these. the deadline for renlgs trags to vote in that state is tuesday. today is friday. if you want to vote in this election you have to be registered by tuesday in pennsylvania. you have to be a u.s. citizen, live in pennsylvania, be 18 years old by election day. what if you don't have a driver's license or another

state issued form of i.d.? that's okay. you can still vote in this election in pennsylvania. it may not be true in subsequent elections but for this election it's okay. republicans in the state of pennsylvania tried this year to block you from voting if you don't have a driver's license or another i.d. like that but they didn't get away with that new law. a judge ruled this week the new rule about i.d. will not be in effect for this election. but yesterday and this was the scoop, we called the state of pennsylvania to ask some questions about voting there in that state this year. this is what we got. listen to this. it's amazing. remember, legally you can vote even if you don't have an i.d. in pennsylvania in this election. you can. listen. >> thank you for calling the pennsylvania department of state bureau of commissions, elections, and legislation. press one for english. press one for information on pennsylvania's new voter i.d. law.

press two for -- >> hello. all pennsylvania voters will be required to show a photo i.d. before voting at a polling place beginning with the november 2012 general election. all photo i.d.s must be current and contain an expiration date unless otherwise noted. >> so that was our scoop last night. our bad scoop. because what you just heard there from the state of pennsylvania is not the law. but it's what the state of pennsylvania was telling people anyway as of yesterday afternoon on the phone line that the state was telling people to call if they had any questions or if they were at all confused about voting this year. so say anybody who doesn't have a driver's license and was calling the state to find out if they can vote, as of yesterday, that recording on the state's phone line for voting help was telling them no you can't vote when in fact legally you can. ultimately when we question the state elections office about that yesterday afternoon they took down that recording. they said it was just an

oversight that they're telling pennsylvanians they cannot vote when in fact they can. the judge's ruling was a big deal. people were counting down to the decision but whether or not everyone who can vote votes in pennsylvania this year, whether or not people who don't have driver's licenses are effectively locked out of this presidential election it only partially depends on the judge's ruling blocking the republican law. it doesn't just depend on the law itself. it depends on what people think the law is in pennsylvania. people are calling the state calling that toll free number to find out about voting and being told when they call that number to effectively not show up if they don't have an i.d. then honestly it doesn't matter what the judge ruled. people without i.d. will probably stay home. pennsylvania elections officials said this week they are pulling their multimillion dollar ad campaign targeted at educating voters about the photo i.d. requirements because of course there is no longer an i.d. requirement. but you know what? even before you get to taking down your ad campaign as you meander around with that task

pennsylvania you might also want to consider this. the bureau of elections for cumberland county in pennsylvania as of today hopefully informing its visitors that, quote, all voters will be required to show photo i.d. at the polling place in the november, 2012, general election. actually voters will not be required to show photo i.d. at the polling place in the november 2012 general election but you'd never know it. look at montgomery county department news. pennsylvania's newly adopted voter i.d. law will not take effect until the november, 2012 election. they also link to this handy voter i.d. flyer. this is not the law. what it says here, this is not true. they are telling people to stay away from the polls when it is in fact legal for them to show up and vote. pennsylvania elections officials, i respect what you do for a living. everybody knows you are busy but it is 32 days to the election. you have to change the information you are giving the voters so it accurately reflects the law and you are not telling

people to stay home who are legally entitled to vote. you are suppressing the vote in your state if you do that. shortly after we called montgomery county today to ask why they were still telling voters in their county on their website that they needed i.d., montgomery county responded by actually changing the language on their website and they took down the link to that scary voter i.d. flyer. wasn't that hard right? but it is not comforting to us here at this show that these things seem to only be getting done in pennsylvania because these counties have gotten a call from a dumb cable news show. really? we're your fail safe here? i mean, the state, the counties? it should not take the rachel maddow show calling you for you to fix this. follow philadelphia county's example. philadelphia had the wherewithal to just change it without us calling or anything. i suggest all the other counties in pennsylvania crib the language from philly. go to their website. cut and paste. it's right there on that site. you will be allowed to vote even if you don't have an i.d.

it's not that hard to do if you care. democrats have been patting themselves on the back all over the country these past couple weeks about the fact they have been winning these voter suppression battles in court against the republicans. they've been stopping the worst of the republican voter suppression laws and it is true they are winning in court all over the country. but if these republican run states are still telling their scitizens that they're going to be disenfranchised the effect is the same whether or not you won the court battle. it should not be a tv show that is first to notice or first to blow the whistle that pennsylvania in practice is ignoring the democrats' big win in the courts. it doesn't get any better than endless shrimp at red lobster. you can mix and match all day!

[ male announcer ] red lobster's endless shrimp is back... but only for a limited time! try as much as you like, any way you like! like parmesan crusted shrimp just $14.99. i'm ryan isabell and i sea food differently.

by the armful? by the barrelful? the carful? how about...by the bowlful? campbell's soups give you nutrition, energy, and can help you keep a healthy weight. campbell's. it's amazing what soup can do. you know how the candidates pick somebody to stand in for their debate opponent before the debates? president obama has had john kerry playing the role of mitt romney in his debate preparation. mr. romney's stand-in for president obama is ohio senator rob portman. today i spent the morning with the man who was playing the part of vice president joe biden in paul ryan's practice sessions for the vice presidential debate next week.

seriously. not kidding. seriously. want to know what happened? that's next. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 let's talk about low-cost investing. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 at schwab, we're committed to offering you tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 low-cost investment options-- tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 like our exchange traded funds, or etfs tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 which now have the lowest tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 operating expenses tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 in their respective tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 lipper categories. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 lower than spdr tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 and even lower than vanguard. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 that means with schwab, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 your portfolio has tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 a better chance to grow. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 and you can trade all our etfs online, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 commission-free, from your schwab account. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 so let's talk about saving money, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 with schwab etfs. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 schwab etfs now have the lowest operating expenses tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 in their respective lipper categories. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 call 1-800-4schwab tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 or visit schwab.com tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 to open an account today. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 funding is easy tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 with schwab mobile deposit. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 investors should consider tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 carefully information tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 contained in the prospectus, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 including investment objectives, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 risks, charges, and expenses. you can obtain tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 a prospectus by visiting tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 www.schwab.com/schwabetfs. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 please read the prospectus tdd#: 1-800-345-2550

carefully before investing. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 [ male announcer ] jill and her mouth have lived a great life. but she has some dental issues she's not happy about. so i introduced jill to crest pro-health for life. selected for people over 50. pro-health for life is a toothpaste that defends against tender, inflamed gums, sensitivity and weak enamel. conditions people over 50 experience. crest pro-health for life. so jill can keep living the good life.

crest. life opens up when you do. the next debate is the vice presidential debate between vice president joe biden and congressman paul ryan. it is set for next thursday. vice president biden's debate practice sessions he's got democratic congressman chris van hollen of maryland playing the role of paul ryan for the purpose of practice. in mr. ryan's debate practices the role of vice president joe biden is being played by celebrated conservative attorney and former george w. bush solicitor general ted olson. ted olson is not your average former bush administration official. he is the former bush administration official who's been leading the legal effort to overturn california's ban on gay marriage and maybe every state's ban on gay marriage. he is very, very, very, very conservative. but he is on the pro gay side of this marriage fight. today at nyu's law school i got a chance to interview ted olson and his cocounsel the celebrated

democratic attorney david boyce. they fought against each other in bush v. gore in the 2000 election but they are fighting together on the side of marriage equality in this federal case. and ted olson is the one of course who sticks out like a sore thumb here. he's a straight, married guy. he does not have a gay family member who has driven him to this decision. he has decided as a small government republican stalwart that marriage equality for gay people is a really important issue for the country and therefore for him. despite the fact his republican party is not with him on this issue pretty much at all he is still very active in republican politics. again, he is the guy who is helping paul ryan prep for next week's vice presidential debate. i talked to ted olson and david boyce about it today. watch. mitt romney and paul ryan are pledging a federal constitutional amendment to define marriage as only for straight people at the federal level, which is unchanged from a george w. bush promise that went unfulfilled.

they're also promising to defend doma with the democrats stopping doing that right now under this administration, the house republicans are defending doma. why isn't the republican party following public opinion on this? and why would you want to elect mitt romney and paul ryan in this circumstance given how you feel about it? >> you may have overlooked the fact that for the last few weeks i've been joe biden. >> mr. olson has been playing the part of joe biden in paul ryan's debate prep which will help paul ryan get better at debating which will help him become vice president which would be bad for gay rights. right? >> or could persuade him on this issue. don't under state the possibility that dialogue and

talking about these issues makes a difference. not just independents and not just democrats but republicans, too. the tides are changing. attitudes are changing. and the way to change those attitudes is dialogue. and the way to change those attitudes is to talk to people about the fundamental right and the way to deal with republicans in my opinion is to say we are the party of abraham lincoln. let's not forget that. what are these -- we say that. let's live up to that. let's think about our principles here. what is decency and privacy and respect? can't talk about what happens in debate preparation but when those issues, if they're issues, they come up in the preparation because they might come up in the debate and you talk about those things and i can argue persuasively as i'm capable of arguing because i'm joe biden now. and even if i was ted olson i could make those arguments and they have to listen because they have to answer those arguments.

and so i'm doing everything i possibly can to convince people of my party because i think it's right for america. >> he went on to finish his thought and got a huge round of applause from this very liberal, pro gay room. in terms of the day-to-day news from the campaign it's kind of an interesting point right? the vice presidential debate is thursday. paul ryan is prepping for that debate with a guy who is also arguing at the supreme court if they agree to hear it this year, arguing passionately for a federal constitutional right to same sex marriage. that's whom he is debate prepping with. as you know public opinion has been shifting fast on this issue. national polls now show a majority of americans support gay couples' right to get married but that ground appears to be shifting under the feet of the republican party. they are not moving nearly as fast as public opinion is. with this antigay national platform of the republican party and a very antigay presidential and vice presidential nominee, both spots on the ticket, the

question of when republican politics catch up with the national change in attitude on gay rights is a question that's getting closer and closer to being a called question. before now being very antigay probably seemed to most republican politicians and many democratic ones like a very safe course like maybe the only safe course. over the past 15 years or so there have been 35 statewide votes on marriage rights and 34 of them have gone against gay rights. the one exception, that was in arizona where voters rejected a gay marriage ban in '06 but in '08 turned around and changed their minds and voted for the gay marriage ban after all. there have been zero victories over all for gay marriage rights at the ballot box in 33 states where it has been on the ballot. and before now every single time gay marriage rights were put on the ballot that issue was put on the ballot by the antigay side. by the side that was confident in the country's antigay voting record and wanted to continue it. this year it's different. this year for the first time ever the pro gay rights side is

so confident in how attitudes have changed that it is the pro gay rights side that has put marriage equality on the ballot for the first time ever because they are convinced they are going to win with voters. it looks like they may be right. the latest polling on maine's ballot initiative to legalize same sex marriage shows gay marriage winning in maine by anywhere from eight points to 21 points. both maryland and washington state this november will be voting on whether to keep marriage rights that were approved by the state legislatures there. in maryland the gay marriage ballot initiative is up by ten points in the polls. and in washington support for gay marriage rights is up by 15 points. gay marriage rights are also on the ballot in minnesota this year and in that state the polling is almost dead even. it's down by one at this point but is very close. marriage equality so far has a really terrible record at the ballot box but this year there is reason to believe it might be different. what does that do to the republican party's politics on this issue? joining us now is the cohost of msnbc's the cycle and a senior

writer at salon.com. thanks for being here. >> happy to be here. >> there were a ton of these gay marriage bans on the ballot in 2004 and the common wisdom was republicans thought it would drive up turnout and help george w. bush get elected by bringing out conservatives who might not like him but who really hated gay people. did that turn out to be the case in '04? >> there is all sorts of speculation about that. you can certainly match up. it was a year in which turnout went up surprisingly overall and it was sort of a base election where the base of each party was activated. i've never seen a definitive study that said yes we can clearly link the x number of voters in ohio or whatever would have stayed home if not for this being on the ballot. you can find a correlation between people who voted against it in a place like ohio and who voted for george w. bush but on a lot of other issues too. >> sort of a mixed bag. the common wisdom doesn't match how fuzzy the data is on that so this year we have same sex marriage questions on the ballot in four states under very different circumstances. the pro gay side putting it on in one state.

two states it's the antigay side putting it on there but it follows the state legislature having passed it through the legislative process and in minnesota it is a traditional antigay measure. what do you think about the democratic confidence or pro gay rights confidence these measures are going to do well this year? >> i think it is very well placed. you can put the map on the screen and it shows 32 or 33 states a complete wipeout for gay marriage at the ballot box all these years. you're talking about four, six, eight years ago on this particular issue. that is an eternity. if you look at the evolution of public opinion on gay marriage it's astounding how fast it's come around. in 2004 when this sort of landed on the national radar because of massachusetts and the supreme court ruling i think the first poll i saw back then nationally, 30% support. now you're talking well over 50% at the national level. when you break that down even further what you're looking at is near 70% in the democratic party. maybe even higher now. that affected the democratic coalition. independents, 57%. this is before obama's announcement. it's only in the republican party down at 22%.

that's what's keeping the overall number in the low to mid 50s. outside the republican party this is basically a settled issue. that means when you put it in a blue state, maine clearly blue, washington clearly blue, maryland clearly blue. the odds are very good that this thing is going to pass comfortably. minnesota we think of as a blue state but it is actually, as it gets closer, three, four, five point win for democrats commonly there, a lot more social conservatives there so it is not surprising it me it's a little closer than minnesota but i think we're at the point where if this goes on the ballot in a blue state it passes. in a swing state it could pass, it might not pass. if it's on the ballot in mississippi or kentucky or places like where it is republican heavy you're a long way away from there, a real long way spending the day today with ted olson seeing his passion and commitment on this issue and also seeing how central he is to the republican party politics, do individuals, can individuals have an out sized impact on what their party does? i mean there is nobody more central to the power in that party than he is.

he's a real advo skacate on thi issue. historically is that the kind of thing that moves parties? >> it can. i think there is going to come a day in both our life times but it might be years from now when the republican party will come around. that is where society is heading. but that might be a decade from now or 15 years. i think it has to be somebody with currency in the evangelical community. the number is so low. there are a lot of factors but about half the republican primary voters nationally in elections call themselves evangelical christians and if you look within that community, middle age and older evangelicals, wild opposition to gay marriage. 18 to 29-year-old evangelicals there is a poll a year ago, 44% support it. so i think that is where the movement is eventually going to come. >> it's going to take time, aging. >> yes. >> cohost of "the cycle" week days here on msnbc. that was very smart. some of the numbers i've heard about it.

appreciate it. we'll be right back. maybe new buildings? what about updated equipment? they can help, but recent research shows... ...nothing transforms schools like investing in advanced teacher education. let's build a strong foundation. let's invest in our teachers so they can inspire our students. let's solve this.

okay. there is a story i bet you have not heard about help that the republican presidential campaign is about to get in this election that i'm not sure is help they want. but they are getting it anyway whether they want it or not. it is coming from alabama. have you heard this story? it is a weird one. that's next. [ male announcer ] at scottrade,

we believe the more you know, the better you trade. so we have ongoing webinars and interactive learning, plus, in-branch seminars at over 500 locations, where our dedicated support teams help you know more so your money can do more. [ rodger ] at scottrade, seven dollar trades are just the start. our teams have the information you want when you need it. it's another reason more investors are saying... [ all ] i'm with scottrade.

are you a non-swing state voter? i am, too. i feel your pain. if you live in new york or mississippi or oklahoma or vermont, there's not a lot of mystery about the election in your state this year. in years like this, no matter how excited you are about the presidential election, if you are a non-swing state voter, you can feel like you don't count. but there's always phone banking. calling people who are in swing states to try to convince those folks to vote for one candidate or the other. usually when non-swing staters get involved, it's stuff like that, phone calls. but on the left there have been some fun culture clashes over the years. involving physically getting up and going to swing states to try and help the democratic candidates in undecided america. you saw that famously in 1968 with the get clean for jean idea.

hippy college kids for eugene mccarthy. they went dehip-fieed. >> by bus or own cars and otherwise, they have come to new hampshire from campuses from as far away as the south and midwest. in the morning in the medicine quarters in an empty store, they got a briefing on how to canvas door to door the most effective way how to win votes for their man rather than loosing. >> more than anything since your with the voters will be brief they're going to judge you on your appearance and demeanor. so it's just crucial that you pay very close attention to the appearance you are presenting. >> get your haircut, hippies.

clean for gene volunteers did make a difference. he got 42% of the vote in new hampshire. you saw a similar mass influx in 2004 in iowa on behalf of the anti-iraq war candidacy. dean campaign's called it the perfect storm. an estimated 3500 campaigners. they were easy to spot because they wore these day-glo safety orange caps. in the end he finished in third place, the perfect orange storm hat did not work. the news editor at the time suggested putting yourself in the boots of an average iowa democrat. it's become a form of political harassment. your form rings every 10 minutes with an automated call. then a knock comes on your door and you find a couple of committed campaigners telling

you that howard dean is your man wearing these really loud orange caps. i can't help them come off as maybe a little precious, maybe a little cultish in those caps. how your campaign presence itself, every nuance of how you present yourself in that circumstance matters. and this year is no exception. consider the great state of alabama. there's no mystery where alabama's electoral votes are going to go this fall. if you're really psyched and you're from alabama, there's no use of you volunteering and campaigning in your home down. they've sent car loads across the border into the florida panhandle to campaign for president obama there. they're not going far. right over that state border.

that's what the democrats are doing. but the republicans from alabama, they are not just day tripping across the state border to somewhere very much like where they are. the republicans in alabama are going long. 200 alabama republican volunteers have reportedly signed up to campaign in ohio. and in some other states in the house, but also ohio. going door to door, soliciting votes for mitt romney. in great howard dean perfect storm style, the alabama republicans have a name for the volunteers they're going to be busing around the country. they're calling them battle ground patriots. they're not just going on trips, they say that they're going on deployments. so bus loads of alabama republicans are deploying, they're going to descend on swing states later this month to per suade swayed people who aren't going to vote for mitt

romney, to vote for mitt romney. regardless of voters say how they feel about individual candidates, voters this year do not like the idea of the republican party. the republican party is not selling right now. more people dislike the republican party than like it. so now into that political reality, what we're going to do is take alabama republicans and spread them out around the country. send them out to meet undecided voters in ohio, to remind those undecided or independent voters what republicanism is all about. hi, we're from alabama and we're here to help. hey, ohio, when you're thinking about voting for mitt romney, think alabama republicans. on the day of his inauguration, alabama's current republican governor said quote, anybody here today who has not accepted jesus christ as your savor, i'm telling you you're not my brother and you're not my sister. the last time we had a snar who

wrote and did a speech about how slavery was not only justified by the bible, he said the under appreciated thing about slavery in the united states was how good slavery was for black people. this was in 1996, not 1896. and the reaction by alabama republicans, well, they just kept him around. he stayed in the state senate for two more years after the slavery was good for black people thing. why not? why get rid of him? what's the problem? last year when demonstrators came to alabama to protest its immigrant law, the party chairman told the press quote this is recommend necessary event of others coming into our state to cause trouble. remind you of that, huh? the mitt romney for president campaign is about to get the benefit of a self pro claimed deployment of hundreds of republican partisans from alabama spreading out through ohio, knocking on doors, talking to people who are statistically likely